Vol. 34 (2018)
Notas científicas

New locality of the endangered Sierra Madre Sparrow (Xenospiza baileyi) from the State of Durango, Mexico, and recommendations for its conservation

José Hugo Martínez-Guerrero
Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango
Jorge Nocedal
PH Consultores Ambientales
Daniel Sierra-Franco
Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango
Samuel Ignacio Arroyo-Arroyo
Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango
Martín Emilio Pereda-Solís
Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango

Publicado 2018-10-26

Palabras clave

  • Xenospiza baileyi,
  • Sierra Madre Sparrow,
  • endemic species,
  • endangered species,
  • Durango,
  • new locality
  • ...Más

Cómo citar

Martínez-Guerrero, J. H., Nocedal, J., Sierra-Franco, D., Arroyo-Arroyo, S. I., & Pereda-Solís, M. E. (2018). New locality of the endangered Sierra Madre Sparrow (Xenospiza baileyi) from the State of Durango, Mexico, and recommendations for its conservation. ACTA ZOOLÓGICA MEXICANA (N.S.), 34(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2018.3412115


The Sierra Madre Sparrow (Xenospiza baileyi) is an endemic species of Mexico that is threatened with extinction. Its distribution is reported in two areas: One in the Transvolcanic Belt of central Mexico (La Cima) near Mexico City and the other in the Sierra Madre Occidental in northwestern Mexico (Ejido Ojo de Agua El Cazador) near the city of Durango, in the state of Durango. The habitat is the same in these two areas, and consists of sub-alpine grassland that is located in shallow valleys or shallows. In our case, "El Bajío la Cantera" of approximately 55 hectares, is mostly used in rainfed agriculture, protected from livestock grazing with wire fences, which in turn represents protection for remnants of grassland where they are the birds. El Bajío la Cantera" belongs to Ejido 12 de Mayo, Municipality of San Dimas, Durango, where 28 males were detected singing along a 500 meter transect. This finding represents the population of the healthiest Sierra Madre Sparrow currently known, so it would be necessary to document their population trend over time. This information can help to evaluate and propose the creation of a special protection area for the species that involves joint government actions and ejidatarios tending to conserve the habitat during the reproductive season in order to increase and / or maintain the size of the population.


  1. Ainsworth, G. B., Aslin, H. J., Weston, M. A., Garnett, S. T. (2016) Do social values influence levels of conservation effort in threatened species? The case of two Australian chats. Oryx, 50, 636–645.
  2. Assad, I., Lundquist, C., Erdmann, M. V., Costello, M. J. (2016) Ecological criteria to identify areas for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 213, 309–316.
  3. Bangs, O. (1931) A new genus and species of American buntings. Proceedings of the New England Zoological Club, 12, 85–88.
  4. Cabrera-García, L., Velázquez-Montes, J. A., Escamilla-Weinmann, M. E. (2006) Identification of priority habitats for conservation of the Sierra Madre Sparrow Xenospiza baileyi in Mexico. Oryx, 40, 1–7.
  5. eBird. (2016) Available at: <http://ebird.org/ebird> (accessed on October 2016).
  6. Gallegos, M. (2014) Sierra Madre Sparrow (Xenospiza baileyi). Neotropical birds online (T. S. Schulenberg, editor). Ithaca: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. Available at:<http://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/portal/species/overview?p_p_spp=656716> (accessed on October 2016).
  7. González-Elizondo, M. S., González-Elizondo, M., Márquez-
  8. Linares, M. A. (2007) Vegetación y Ecorregiones de Durango. Plaza y Valdés. México, D.F.
  9. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística) (2018) Durango, núcleos agrarios, tabulados básicos por municipio. En: <http://www3.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/TabuladosBasicos/tabulados/catastro/tbe_dgo.PDF>
  10. IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) (2018) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2017-3. Available at: <http://www.iucnredlist.org> (accessed on April 2018).
  11. Klicka, J., Spellman, G. M. (2007) A molecular evaluation of the North American grassland sparrow clade. The Auk, 124, 537–551.
  12. Klicka, J., Barker, F. K., Burns, K. J., Lanyon, S. M., Lovette, I. J., Chaves, J.A., Bryson, R. W. (2014) A comprehensive multilocus assessment of sparrow (Aves: Passerellidae) relationships. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 77, 177–182.
  13. Oliveras de Ita, A., Gómez de Silva, H. (2002) Nueva localidad para el gorrión serrano (Xenospiza baileyi). Ornitología Neotropical, 13, 203–204.
  14. Oliveras de Ita, A., Rojas-Soto, O. R. (2006) A survey for the Sierra Madre Sparrow (Xenospiza baileyi), with its rediscovery in the state of Durango, Mexico. Bird Conservation International, 16, 25–32.
  15. Oliveras de Ita, A., Oyama, K., Smith, T. B., Wayne, R. K., Milá, B. (2012) Genetic evidence for recent range fragmentation and severely restricted dispersal in the critically endangered Sierra Madre Sparrow, Xenospiza baileyi. Conservation Genetics, 12, 283–291.
  16. Pitelka, F. A. (1947) Taxonomy and distribution of the Mexican Sparrow Xenospiza baileyi. The Condor, 49, 199–203.
  17. RAN (Registro Agrario Nacional) (2018) Datos abiertos al público de información ejidal. En: <http://datos.ran.gob.mx/conjuntoDatosPublico.php> (accessed on April 2018).
  18. Rojas-Soto, O. R., Martínez-Meyer, E., Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G., Oliveras de Ita, A., Gómez de Silva, H., Peterson, A. T. (2008) Modeling distributions of disjunct populations of the Sierra Madre Sparrow. Journal of Field Ornithology, 79, 245–253.
  19. SEMARNAT (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales) (2010) Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT -2010, protección ambiental - especies nativas de México de flora y fauna Silvestre -categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación, jueves 30 de diciembre de 2010. México, D.F.
  20. Stirnemann, R. L., Potter, M. A., Butler, D., Minot, E. O. (2016) Slow life history traits in an endangered tropical island bird, the Ma’oma’o. Bird Conservation International, 26, 366–379.